Inside the Earth

[Aeternitas]

Open your physics textbook and you'll find out.

There's lot of rubbish in the physics textbooks. I saw lot of them, many of them contradicting, most of them obsolete. Yes, physicists say there's magma world, but nobody was there ever.

Such a bold statement. For example what? Nobody was at the Venus or Neptun yet we know their composition. We have actually tones of observations and evidence, that Earth core's indeed molten and extremely hot.

I don't think I will find the solution here. It's just debate about the opinions of the people, not searching what is really inside.

Concerning the books, I read many of them, I talked with many scientists, heard many opinions, so believe me I know what I'm talking about. The science changes every tens of years, because the scientiests can't explain many things, so they change the science. All we have is bunch of theories constructed sometimes out of the hand, constructed so they can explain something, but not everything. If you go in every theory far enough into the basics, you find nothing but void, which is not explained. That's all we have. But as I said, I'm not looking for a solution here but for the opinions of the people around.

[Shoggot]

If you're not interested in the truth and only opinions, you're not looking for debate or discussion. So don't expect anyone to discuss or debate with you, because right now you just pushed yourself out of the position of participant in discussion or debate (these two are different terms).
Your opinion on science is completely flawed but it is good that you told your point of view here. It would be futile to explain you why science changes it's claims from time to time, because you're simply not read for it.

For now on we just know that we can't take you seriously and I thank you for being so clear in forward.

[Aeternitas]

If you're not interested in the truth and only opinions, you're not looking for debate or discussion. So don't expect anyone to discuss or debate with you, because right now you just pushed yourself out of the position of participant in discussion or debate (these two are different terms).
Your opinion on science is completely flawed but it is good that you told your point of view here. It would be futile to explain you why science changes it's claims from time to time, because you're simply not read for it.

For now on we just know that we can't take you seriously and I thank you for being so clear in forward.

Truth? What is thruth? You say something therefore it is thruth? You really think you will find among people from secondary schools or sometimes unis the truth about the world that cannot be solved by highest brains of the world? I'm not so naive to believe that my own words are the best of all - like you believe in yours words - and anyone else is just lunatic if he thinks I'm wrong. Lol.

I just opened this topics that people can tell what they believe in. That's all.

[Shoggot]

If you're not interested in the truth and only opinions, you're not looking for debate or discussion. So don't expect anyone to discuss or debate with you, because right now you just pushed yourself out of the position of participant in discussion or debate (these two are different terms).
Your opinion on science is completely flawed but it is good that you told your point of view here. It would be futile to explain you why science changes it's claims from time to time, because you're simply not read for it.

For now on we just know that we can't take you seriously and I thank you for being so clear in forward.

Truth? What is thruth? You say something therefore it is thruth? You really think you will find among people from secondary schools or sometimes unis the truth about the world that cannot be solved by highest brains of the world? I'm not so naive to believe that my own words are the best of all - like you believe in yours words - and anyone else is just lunatic if he thinks I'm wrong. Lol.

I just opened this topics that people can tell what they believe in. That's all.

Rhetorical questions. Loaded questions. Begging questions. Such a logical fallacy that it really doesn't deserve response.
You just told me to believe in your words on this page and you wouldn't do it if you were so humble about your words.
Some opinions are based on facts, evidences and observations and some are not. Opinions have no equal value and there those more based on reality and those that are not. Opinions are like nipples. Everyone has them. Some are firm around the edges, some are pointy and some are somewhat lame. Cats have 8.

You should be open minded, but not that much to make your brain fall out. And that's probably all. I have no reason to debate with someone who is not at all interested in finding the truth and is only interested in presenting opinions no matter how ridiculous they are and who clearly has no idea how science works.